Academic Research

The Science Behind the Work

My ideas are grounded in two decades of peer-reviewed research, conducted at Harvard Business School and beyond. Below is a plain-English guide to my published work — what I studied, what I found, and why it matters.

Harvard Business School faculty · 2004–2016

8

Years at Harvard Business School

57+

Published papers

5

Research themes

40

H-index

66K+

Citations (Google Scholar)

Landmark Studies

Most Influential Work

Ordered by scholarly impact. My most-cited contribution — the Stereotype Content Model — is one of the most widely cited frameworks in modern social psychology, and the foundation of my work on how warmth and competence shape every social judgment we make.

Stereotype Content Model2002

A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype Content: Competence and Warmth Respectively Follow From Status and Competition

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · Fiske, S.T., Cuddy, A.J.C., Glick, P., & Xu, J.

12,556+ citations

This foundational paper introduced the Stereotype Content Model (SCM), showing that all social groups are evaluated on two fundamental dimensions: warmth and competence. Warmth is driven by perceived cooperation; competence by perceived status. The model explains why stereotypes are often ambivalent — groups can be seen as warm-but-incompetent or competent-but-cold.

Key Finding

All social groups are stereotyped along two universal dimensions — warmth and competence — driven by perceived cooperation and status.

Read paper →
Stereotype Content Model2007

Universal Dimensions of Social Cognition: Warmth, Then Competence

Trends in Cognitive Sciences · Fiske, S.T., Cuddy, A.J.C., & Glick, P.

6,953+ citations

A concise synthesis showing that warmth and competence emerge as universal organizing principles for how people judge both individuals and groups — across cultures, contexts, and types of social evaluation. Crucially, warmth is evaluated first and often matters more than competence in social outcomes.

Key Finding

Warmth is judged before competence and often outweighs it — being seen as trustworthy matters more than being seen as capable.

Stereotype Content Model2008

Warmth and Competence as Universal Dimensions of Social Perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map

Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · Cuddy, A.J.C., Fiske, S.T., & Glick, P.

4,055+ citations

An expanded treatment of the SCM introducing the BIAS Map (Behaviors from Intergroup Affect and Stereotypes), linking warmth and competence judgments to four concrete behavioral outcomes: active facilitation, passive facilitation, active harm, and passive harm. High warmth/high competence groups receive active help; low on both receive active harm.

Key Finding

Warmth and competence judgments predict four specific behavioral outcomes toward groups, from active help to active harm.

Read paper →
Stereotype Content Model2007

The BIAS Map: Behaviors From Intergroup Affect and Stereotypes

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · Cuddy, A.J.C., Fiske, S.T., & Glick, P.

3,303+ citations

Stereotypes don't just describe groups — they predict how people will act toward them. This paper demonstrated that the warmth and competence dimensions generate distinct emotional responses (pity, envy, admiration, contempt) which in turn predict specific discriminatory behaviors ranging from patronizing help to active hostility.

Key Finding

Stereotype content generates distinct emotions that predict concrete discriminatory behaviors toward different social groups.

Read paper →
Gender & Work2004

When Professionals Become Mothers, Warmth Doesn't Cut the Ice

Journal of Social Issues · Cuddy, A.J.C., Fiske, S.T., & Glick, P.

1,602+ citations

Working mothers face an impossible double bind: they are expected to be warm (as mothers) but are penalized if this comes at the cost of competence, while also being penalized if they prioritize career competence over communal warmth. This research quantifies the competing demands placed on professional women with children.

Key Finding

Working mothers face incompatible expectations for warmth and competence, creating a documented no-win scenario in professional settings.

Read paper →

Browse by Theme

Five Research Areas

My research spans two decades and five interconnected themes. Each paper summary is written in plain English — no academic jargon required.

Stereotype Content Model

Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of how people perceive social groups — Amy's most-cited body of work, foundational to modern social psychology.

6 papers

2002

A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype Content: Competence and Warmth Respectively Follow From Status and Competition

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · Fiske, S.T., Cuddy, A.J.C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. · 12,556+ citations

This foundational paper introduced the Stereotype Content Model (SCM), showing that all social groups are evaluated on two fundamental dimensions: warmth and competence. Warmth is driven by perceived cooperation; competence by perceived status. The model explains why stereotypes are often ambivalent — groups can be seen as warm-but-incompetent or competent-but-cold.

All social groups are stereotyped along two universal dimensions — warmth and competence — driven by perceived cooperation and status.

Read paper →
2007

Universal Dimensions of Social Cognition: Warmth, Then Competence

Trends in Cognitive Sciences · Fiske, S.T., Cuddy, A.J.C., & Glick, P. · 6,953+ citations

A concise synthesis showing that warmth and competence emerge as universal organizing principles for how people judge both individuals and groups — across cultures, contexts, and types of social evaluation. Crucially, warmth is evaluated first and often matters more than competence in social outcomes.

Warmth is judged before competence and often outweighs it — being seen as trustworthy matters more than being seen as capable.

2008

Warmth and Competence as Universal Dimensions of Social Perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map

Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · Cuddy, A.J.C., Fiske, S.T., & Glick, P. · 4,055+ citations

An expanded treatment of the SCM introducing the BIAS Map (Behaviors from Intergroup Affect and Stereotypes), linking warmth and competence judgments to four concrete behavioral outcomes: active facilitation, passive facilitation, active harm, and passive harm. High warmth/high competence groups receive active help; low on both receive active harm.

Warmth and competence judgments predict four specific behavioral outcomes toward groups, from active help to active harm.

Read paper →
2007

The BIAS Map: Behaviors From Intergroup Affect and Stereotypes

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · Cuddy, A.J.C., Fiske, S.T., & Glick, P. · 3,303+ citations

Stereotypes don't just describe groups — they predict how people will act toward them. This paper demonstrated that the warmth and competence dimensions generate distinct emotional responses (pity, envy, admiration, contempt) which in turn predict specific discriminatory behaviors ranging from patronizing help to active hostility.

Stereotype content generates distinct emotions that predict concrete discriminatory behaviors toward different social groups.

Read paper →
2009

Stereotype Content Model Across Cultures: Universal Similarities and Some Differences

British Journal of Social Psychology · Cuddy, A.J.C., Fiske, S.T., Kwan, V.S.Y., Glick, P., Demoulin, S., et al. · 1,594+ citations

A 33-country study testing whether the SCM's warmth-competence framework applies universally. While specific groups stereotyped as warm or competent vary by culture, the two-dimensional structure itself was consistent across all countries, establishing the SCM as a genuinely cross-cultural model of social perception.

The warmth-competence framework of stereotyping is universal across 33 countries, even when specific stereotyped groups differ.

Read paper →
2013

Nations' Income Inequality Predicts Ambivalence in Stereotype Content

British Journal of Social Psychology · Durante, F., Fiske, S.T., Kervyn, N., Cuddy, A.J.C., et al.

Countries with wider income gaps between rich and poor show more ambivalent stereotypes — more mixed warmth-competence judgments — than egalitarian societies. This research demonstrates that economics and social structure directly shape the content of cultural stereotypes, not just individual attitudes.

National income inequality correlates with more ambivalent group stereotypes, showing that social structure shapes cultural perception.

Read paper →
Intergroup Relations

How stereotypes generate emotion and predict helping, harming, and discrimination across groups.

4 papers

2005

This Old Stereotype: The Stubbornness and Pervasiveness of the Elderly Stereotype

Journal of Social Issues · Cuddy, A.J.C., Norton, M.I., & Fiske, S.T. · 1,498+ citations

Elderly people are reliably stereotyped as warm but incompetent — a pattern that is remarkably consistent across studies and highly resistant to change. Despite positive warmth ratings, this stereotype still produces patronizing and exclusionary behaviors, showing that even 'positive' stereotypes carry costs.

The warm-but-incompetent elderly stereotype is unusually persistent and resistant to change, with real discriminatory consequences.

Read paper →
2004

Why Ordinary People Torture Enemy Prisoners

Science · Fiske, S.T., Harris, L.T., & Cuddy, A.J.C.

This widely-discussed brief communication in Science applied the SCM's dehumanization framework to explain Abu Ghraib-style abuses. Groups perceived as low in both warmth and competence are psychologically dehumanized, and the SCM predicts they will be targets of active contempt and harm — explaining how ordinary people commit atrocities.

Groups stereotyped as both incompetent and hostile are dehumanized and become targets of active harm, explaining situational torture.

Read paper →
2008

When Being a Model Minority Is Good… and Bad: Realistic Threat Explains Negativity Toward Asian Americans

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · Cuddy, A.J.C., Norton, M.I., & Fiske, S.T.

Asian Americans are stereotyped as high-competence but low-warmth — and this already-ambivalent stereotype becomes more hostile when Asian Americans are perceived as economic competitors. The 'model minority' label is revealed as a double-edged sword: positive surface framing that activates envy and resentment when stakes feel high.

Model minority stereotypes intensify into hostility when the group is perceived as a competitive economic threat.

Read paper →
2009

Social Structure Shapes Cultural Stereotypes and Emotions: A Causal Test of the Stereotype Content Model

Group Processes and Intergroup Relations · Caprariello, P., Cuddy, A.J.C., & Fiske, S.T.

By experimentally manipulating the perceived status and competitiveness between groups, this study provided causal evidence that social structure directly shapes stereotype content. When a group's status rises, warmth ratings drop and competence ratings rise — showing stereotypes aren't fixed beliefs but dynamic responses to social conditions.

Changes in group status and competition causally change warmth and competence stereotypes, confirming the SCM's structural predictions.

Read paper →
Gender & Work

How gender stereotypes affect professional women, especially mothers and those in leadership.

3 papers

2004

When Professionals Become Mothers, Warmth Doesn't Cut the Ice

Journal of Social Issues · Cuddy, A.J.C., Fiske, S.T., & Glick, P. · 1,602+ citations

Working mothers face an impossible double bind: they are expected to be warm (as mothers) but are penalized if this comes at the cost of competence, while also being penalized if they prioritize career competence over communal warmth. This research quantifies the competing demands placed on professional women with children.

Working mothers face incompatible expectations for warmth and competence, creating a documented no-win scenario in professional settings.

Read paper →
2015

Men as Cultural Ideals: Cultural Values Moderate Gender Stereotype Content

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · Wolf, E.B., Glick, P., Crotty, S., Chong, J., Norton, M.I., & Cuddy, A.J.C.

Men are stereotyped as embodying cultural ideals more than women, but the nature of this advantage depends on whether the culture values individualism or communalism. The research shows that gender stereotypes are not fixed but shaped by the specific values a society holds most dear.

Cultural values determine how strongly men are stereotyped as cultural ideals — the male advantage varies across individualistic and communal societies.

Read paper →
2021

The Future of Women in Psychological Science

Perspectives on Psychological Science · Gruber, J., Mendle, J., Lindquist, K.A., Schmader, T., Clark, L.A., Bliss-Moreau, E., Cuddy, A.J.C., et al.

A forward-looking perspective piece examining the structural barriers that limit women's advancement in psychological science and offering concrete recommendations for systemic change. The paper draws on both research and lived experience to chart a more equitable future for the field.

Structural — not individual — barriers are the primary obstacle to women's advancement in psychological science.

Leadership & Stress

The physiological and psychological dynamics of power, leadership, and workplace perception.

2 papers

2012

Leadership Is Associated With Lower Levels of Stress

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · Sherman, G.D., Lee, J.J., Cuddy, A.J.C., Renshon, J., Oveis, C., Gross, J.J., & Lerner, J.S.

Leaders have significantly lower cortisol levels than non-leaders, and this effect is mediated by the sense of control that comes with power — not merely by external demands. The finding challenges the assumption that leadership is inherently more stressful, suggesting that having agency and control is physiologically protective.

Leaders have lower cortisol (stress) levels than non-leaders, driven by the sense of control that accompanies power.

Read paper →
2011

The Dynamics of Warmth and Competence Judgments, and Their Outcomes in Organizations

Research in Organizational Behavior · Cuddy, A.J.C., Glick, P., & Beninger, A.

Applied the warmth-competence framework directly to workplace settings, showing that these two dimensions predict hiring decisions, performance evaluations, mentorship, and promotion. Critically, warmth judgments are made rapidly and are hard to revise — making first impressions in organizations especially consequential.

In organizations, warmth judgments are made first and persistently shape hiring, mentoring, and career advancement.

Read paper →
Nonverbal Behavior & Posture

How body posture and expansive displays relate to feelings of power and presence.

5 papers

2010

Power Posing: Brief Nonverbal Displays Affect Neuroendocrine Levels and Risk Tolerance

Psychological Science · Carney, D.R., Cuddy, A.J.C., & Yap, A.J. · 1,880+ citations

The original power-posing study showed that adopting expansive, open postures changes how people feel — most reliably, how powerful and confident they feel. The central effect, that posture shapes our psychological state, has since been borne out across dozens of independent studies and a comprehensive meta-analysis of the postural-feedback literature.

Adopting expansive postures reliably increases how powerful and confident people feel — one of the most-replicated effects in this body of research.

Read paper →
2018

P-Curving a More Comprehensive Body of Research on Postural Feedback Reveals Clear Evidential Value for Power-Posing Effects

Psychological Science · Cuddy, A.J.C., Schultz, S.J., & Fosse, N.E.

This comprehensive analysis examined the full body of postural-feedback research — 55 studies conducted by more than 40 independent teams. Using p-curve analysis, it found clear, strong evidential value that adopting expansive postures causes people to feel more powerful, establishing the effect as one of the better-supported findings in the field.

A review of 55 studies from 40+ independent labs found clear evidential value for the effect of expansive posture on felt power.

Read paper →
2015

Preparatory Power Posing Affects Nonverbal Presence and Job Interview Performance

Journal of Applied Psychology · Cuddy, A.J.C., Wilmuth, C.A., Yap, A.J., & Carney, D.R.

Candidates who adopted an expansive pose before a job interview were rated more hireable by evaluators — not because they changed what they said, but because of the nonverbal presence they carried into the room. The effect was driven by presence, not verbal content.

Preparatory posing improves interview performance by enhancing nonverbal presence, not verbal content.

Read paper →
2013

The Ergonomics of Dishonesty: The Effect of Incidental Expansive Posture on Stealing, Cheating, and Traffic Violations

Psychological Science · Yap, A.J., Wazlawek, A.S., Lucas, B.J., Cuddy, A.J.C., & Carney, D.R.

Expansive postures may also carry a downside: people in expansive poses were more likely to take a too-large payment, cheat on a test, and commit simulated traffic violations. The research suggests that feeling powerful can reduce adherence to rules, with implications for the design of workplaces and environments.

Expansive postures can increase rule-breaking, suggesting environmental design may inadvertently encourage dishonesty.

Read paper →
2017

Visual Attention to Powerful Postures: People Avert Their Gaze From Nonverbal Dominance Displays

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · Holland, E., Wolf, E.B., Looser, C., & Cuddy, A.J.C.

People instinctively look away from dominant, expansive postures — a subtle signal of submission and respect that mirrors what's seen in primates. Eye-tracking studies showed this gaze aversion happens automatically and rapidly, connecting evolutionary biology to modern dynamics of power and hierarchy.

People automatically avert their gaze from dominance displays, reflecting an evolved submissive response to power.

Go Deeper

Read the Full Research

All papers are available via Google Scholar. For reprint requests or research collaborations, please get in touch.

Follow the Work

Stay updated on new research

I write about my findings for general audiences — subscribe to hear about new papers, findings, and what they mean in practice.