Topic
Stereotyping & Prejudice
How the mind sorts people into categories — and what those categories cost us, individually and collectively.
Before I became known for power posing, I spent years studying something more fundamental: how human beings perceive one another, and how those perceptions — formed in milliseconds and rarely updated — shape the opportunities, treatment, and lives of entire groups of people.
That work, developed in close collaboration with Susan Fiske and Peter Glick at Princeton and Harvard, produced the Stereotype Content Model — a framework for understanding not just that stereotypes exist, but why they take the specific forms they do, what emotions they produce, and what behaviours they predict. It is one of the most widely replicated and cited models in all of social psychology.
The research spans workplaces and courtrooms, history and neuroscience. It explains why mothers face a specific form of professional discrimination distinct from general gender bias. It illuminates the emotional mechanics of antisemitism and other forms of envy-based prejudice. It maps how societies treat their elderly, their poor, and those they have decided to distrust. And it shows that these patterns, across cultures and centuries, follow a logic — one that can be understood, anticipated, and interrupted.
The Framework
Warmth × Competence
The Stereotype Content Model holds that all social perception reduces, at its core, to two questions: is this person or group warm? and are they competent? The answers to those two questions determine almost everything else.
Admiration
In-group members, close allies
Active helping and facilitation
Pity
Elderly people, people with disabilities
Paternalistic help — kind but limiting
Envy
Jewish people, Asian Americans, the wealthy
Passive admiration, active hostility under threat
Contempt
The homeless, welfare recipients
Active and passive harm
Research Areas
What the research covers
The Stereotype Content Model
The central contribution of my work on prejudice. Developed with Susan Fiske and Peter Glick and first published in 2002, the Stereotype Content Model proposes that social groups are not judged along a single axis of liking and disliking. Instead, social perception organises itself around two fundamental dimensions: warmth (is this group friendly, trustworthy, well-intentioned?) and competence (is this group capable, skilled, intelligent?). Where a group lands on those two dimensions determines not just the stereotype applied to it, but the specific emotions it elicits and the specific behaviours directed toward it. The model has been replicated across more than 26 countries and is one of the most widely cited frameworks in social psychology.
Four clusters, four emotional responses
The warmth-competence framework produces four distinct social clusters, each with a characteristic emotional signature. Groups seen as high-warmth and high-competence — typically in-group members — elicit pride and admiration. Groups seen as high-warmth but low-competence — the elderly, people with disabilities — elicit pity and paternalistic treatment: superficially kind but practically limiting. Groups seen as low-warmth but high-competence — Jewish people, Asian Americans, wealthy professionals — elicit envy: respect for achievement combined with resentment of it. And groups seen as low on both dimensions — the homeless, welfare recipients, undocumented immigrants — elicit contempt: the only quadrant associated with purely hostile treatment from all directions.
Envious prejudice and antisemitism
One of the most important and least understood forms of prejudice operates through envy rather than contempt. Groups stereotyped as highly competent but insufficiently warm — including Jewish people, Asian Americans, and other groups framed as 'model minorities' — occupy the envy quadrant of the SCM. They are admired for their achievements while simultaneously resented for them. This produces a distinctive and dangerous pattern: passive admiration in stable times, and active hostility in times of social stress, economic threat, or political instability. The historical pattern of scapegoating highly envied groups — associating their success with malign intent — maps directly onto this framework. Envy-based prejudice is the emotional precondition for some of the most extreme forms of intergroup violence in human history.
The maternal wall
When women become mothers, something specific happens to how they are perceived in professional contexts: their warmth ratings rise, and their competence ratings fall. This is not a general devaluation — it is a precise shift within the warmth-competence space, and it has precise consequences. My research with Fiske and Glick found that this shift triggers pity rather than respect — and pity, in workplace contexts, translates into discriminatory behaviour. Mothers are less likely to be hired, less likely to be promoted, more likely to be offered part-time roles framed as accommodations but functioning as career limiters, and earn measurably less than childless women with equivalent qualifications. The maternal wall is one of the most robustly documented forms of workplace gender discrimination — and it operates not through overt hostility but through ostensibly warm, helpful treatment that nonetheless forecloses opportunity.
Men as cultural ideals
My research on gender stereotyping examines not just how women are perceived and treated, but how masculinity functions as a social construct that shapes expectations, constraints, and consequences for men. Gender stereotypes are bidirectional: they limit women's access to competence-associated roles, and they limit men's access to warmth-associated roles and behaviours. Research on stereotype content and gender shows that men who violate warmth norms — by showing vulnerability, care, or emotional openness — face a distinct form of backlash, different in kind from the competence-based backlash faced by assertive women. Understanding gender prejudice requires understanding both directions of this constraint.
Prejudice against older adults
My research with colleagues on the stereotyping of elderly people reveals a particularly instructive pattern. Older adults are reliably placed in the high-warmth, low-competence quadrant — viewed as warm and likeable but treated as incapable, irrelevant, or invisible in professional contexts. This combination — pity-based prejudice — produces a specific form of discrimination that masquerades as care: speaking more slowly to older people, excluding them from decisions 'for their own good,' and systematically underestimating their capabilities. The pervasiveness and persistence of age-based stereotyping, even among people who explicitly reject prejudice, illustrates how deeply embedded warmth-competence judgments are in social cognition.
The BIAS Map
The Stereotype Content Model describes how groups are perceived and what emotions they elicit. The BIAS Map (Behaviors from Intergroup Affect and Stereotypes), which I developed with Fiske and Glick, extends this framework to predict specific behaviours. Different stereotype combinations predict different behavioural tendencies: active harm versus passive neglect, active facilitation versus passive acceptance. The BIAS Map shows that the relationship between prejudice and discrimination is not random — it follows a predictable logic determined by where a group sits in warmth-competence space. This has practical implications for designing interventions: understanding the type of prejudice a group faces helps predict which forms of discrimination to expect and where to direct change efforts.
Peer-Reviewed Research
Key papers
Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
The foundational paper introducing the Stereotype Content Model. Proposes that warmth and competence are the two primary axes of social perception, and maps twenty-five social groups across this space. One of the most cited papers in social psychology.
Cuddy, Fiske & Glick · Journal of Social Issues
Documents the maternal wall: motherhood raises perceived warmth but lowers perceived competence, producing pity-based discrimination in hiring, salary, and promotion decisions. One of the most influential papers on the motherhood penalty.
Cuddy, Fiske & Glick · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Extends the SCM to predict specific discriminatory behaviours — active versus passive, harmful versus facilitative — based on the warmth-competence profile of the target group. Provides a behavioural map of prejudice consequences.
Fiske, Cuddy & Glick · Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Reviews the cross-cultural and evolutionary evidence for warmth and competence as the primary dimensions of social perception, arguing they reflect fundamental adaptive priorities: detecting intent (warmth) and capability (competence).
Cuddy, Norton & Fiske · Journal of Social Issues
Examines how older adults are stereotyped as warm but incompetent across contexts, and how this pity-based stereotype persists even among people who explicitly reject prejudice — with real consequences for how older adults are treated.
Cuddy, Fiske, Kwan, Glick, Demoulin, Leyens et al. · British Journal of Social Psychology
Cross-national validation of the SCM across ten countries spanning multiple cultural and economic contexts. Finds the warmth-competence structure and its emotional consequences to be broadly universal, with variation in which groups occupy which positions.
Stay Connected
Get my latest research and writing
New insights on presence, power, and what the science actually says — delivered directly to your inbox.